-
Industries such as financial services, oil and gas, nuclear energy, life sciences, healthcare, and the public sector are subject to specific laws or regulations dictating the long-term retention of specific information types — but a single compliance-driven thinking doesn’t help protect less-regulated information within the same organisation. A single compliance-driven approach also does not resonate with every enterprise user beyond the compliance teams, leaving such programmes with a narrow business case resulting in poor user adoption and very little change in behaviours to manage information effectively to deliver value.
-
Don't kick the can down the road!
Companies must adopt a mindset that compliance-driven governance is a minimum threshold instead of the entire scope.
Long term Information Governance risks and benefits are real — act Today even if IT landscape isn't Perfect
Actively plan for long-term retention of data that holds corporate memory and plan to automatically dispose the information beyond its legitimate purpose
Why Microsoft Information Governance initiatives MUST go beyond risk management?
Annotations:
Carved in Stone? Let’s edit it! – Open Preservation Foundation
"Changing AIPs after Ingest"
EFSS Is Dead. Long Live EFSS! – Deep Analysis
"File Sync and Share (EFSS) technology has been around for more than 15 years, initially focusing on the consumer market and then, in the last decade, moving to enterprises as well. No longer new technology, it has gone mainstream after starting as a niche and novel web application. [...] the questions driving our research for this report were, essentially, has the market matured, and is there anything new to say about it?"
Do you trust our digital archive? – Open Preservation Foundation
"The National Archives UK has been working with University of Warwick and five UK archive partners to develop a statistical model which quantifies digital preservation risk. This decision support tool allows digital archivists to compare and prioritise preservation policies and offers a way of understanding digital preservation as a complex network of interdependent risks rather than a prescriptive list of practices and policies to keep their collection preserved. "