Ce document a été réalisé dans le cadre du projet de R&D du FUI 12 pour la conception d’une plateforme collaborative de correction et d’enrichissement des documents numérisés.
Étiquette : crowdsourcing
« The keynote address for the Spring 2012 Midwest Archives Conference meeting. This talk continues and expands on my working definition of « participatory archives, » providing examples and talking about the relationship between participation and engagement. «
Annotations:
-
Interestingly, paintings can be ‘retired’ from the Tagger once enough data has been gathered
-
the inherent reward of participating in the activity was a bigger motivator than competitiveness,
-
definitions of crowdsourcing in cultural heritage: ‘a form of engagement that contributes towards a shared, significant goal or research question by asking the public to undertake tasks that cannot be done automatically’ or ‘productive public engagement with the mission and work of memory institutions’.
-
it has to produce results of value to the research community in less time than could have been done by other means
-
built a focused ‘talk‘ tool which can programmatically filter out the most interesting unanswered comments and email them to their 30 or 40 expert users
-
full text transcriptions (difficult to automatically reconcile) vs ‘rich
metadata’
-
in some projects, interactions with a central authority are valued, in others, community interactions are really important.
-
The potential and dangers of ‘gamification’ and ‘badgeification’ and their potentially negative impact on motivation were raised
-
have you met participants in real life?’ – answer, yes, and it was an opportunity to learn from them